Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Discover how Skims hit $5B in 2025, boosted Kim Kardashian's $1.9B net worth, and reshaped the Kardashian Jenner empire dramatically.
Kim Kardashian is a reality TV icon, a mom of four, a fashion mogul, and the engine behind the modern Kardashian Jenner business empire. She turned attention into action with smart product brands and nonstop media moments. Her shapewear and clothing label, Skims, sits at the center of that story. In 2025, Skims reached an eye catching $5 billion valuation after a fresh funding round. That win helped cement Kim’s status as the richest member of her famous family.
In November 2025, Skims closed about $225 million in new funding led by Goldman Sachs Alternatives. BDT and MSD Partners also took part. The round lifted Skims to a $5 billion valuation. Management signaled that 2025 net sales could top $1 billion, which gave investors confidence about scale and growth ahead [3][5].
Two things stood out. First, Skims had strong momentum, moving up from an already high valuation in prior rounds. Second, the brand was breaking out beyond shapewear into apparel, active, and mens categories, and testing more retail. That wider product and channel mix lowered risk and raised the ceiling on future revenue [3][5].
Investors look for proof. Skims delivered strong direct to consumer demand, viral launches, and repeat customers. The brand also pulled in cultural clout and partnerships that built trust and awareness fast. That combination points to a long product life and a large addressable market. Investors paid up for that story and for the leadership team’s track record [3][5].
Consumer investors tend to price fast growing brands on revenue multiples. If a brand has high gross margins, strong retention, and runway for new categories, it can earn a premium multiple. Skims fits that profile. It is known for tight product drops, solid margins typical of DTC apparel, and fast expansion into basics and mens. On top of that, Kim’s reach lowers customer acquisition costs compared to many peers, which improves the unit economics.
You can think of it this way. Assume Skims clears more than $1 billion in net sales for 2025. At a $5 billion valuation, that suggests a mid single digit multiple of current year sales. For a celebrity led category leader with strong growth, that is aggressive but not unheard of in premium apparel. The price also reflects belief in new categories, store growth, and international expansion that can push revenue higher over time [3][5].
Here is a simple, mobile friendly timeline that shows the step ups most readers care about. Numbers are based on public reporting and industry coverage.
| Year | Round or Milestone | Approx. Valuation | Lead Investors | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Growth round | About $4 billion | Wellington Management | Reported raise around $270 million [5] |
| 2024 | Scale up year | High growth | Prior backers | Brand momentum, category expansion reported in media |
| 2025 | New funding | $5 billion | Goldman Sachs Alternatives, BDT and MSD Partners | $225 million raise, >$1B 2025 net sales outlook [3][5] |
Note: Earlier rounds and valuations were widely covered. The key step is the 2025 milestone to $5 billion, which is the focal point of this article [3][5].
Kim’s net worth in 2025 is estimated at about $1.9 billion, with Skims as the largest driver [2]. The new valuation lifts the paper value of her stake in the company. The exact number depends on her ownership percentage and the terms of each financing round.
Reports have cited an ownership stake for Kim of about 35 percent. Using the $5 billion figure, that would make her stake worth a large amount on paper. Conservative models that account for dilution or preferred share terms imply a stake value in the range of about $1.3 billion to $1.4 billion, with upside if her percentage is higher [1][3].
Yes. The table below shows how different ownership percentages translate to paper value at a $5 billion valuation. This is a simplified view. It does not factor in preferred share terms, taxes on a sale, or lockups. It is only a way to visualize the range.
| Ownership | Stake Value at $5B |
|---|---|
| 25 percent | $1.25 billion |
| 28 percent | $1.40 billion |
| 30 percent | $1.50 billion |
| 35 percent | $1.75 billion |
Context: Some coverage mentions Kim at about 35 percent ownership [1]. Other estimates discuss a lower effective value after considering investor preferences and other terms. The $1.3 to $1.4 billion range aligns with more conservative assumptions [1][3].
Yes. With an estimated net worth of about $1.9 billion in 2025, Kim is the richest in the family. Kylie Jenner’s net worth is widely cited around $700 million for 2025. That spread reflects Skims’ valuation climb and Kim’s large stake in the business [2][4].
Public sources do not disclose a full balance sheet, but we can sketch a simple, directional view for education. These are estimates, not audited numbers. The point is to show relative weight, not exact values.
| Asset or Category | Illustrative Estimate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Skims stake | $1.3B to $1.75B | Range depends on ownership and terms at $5B valuation [1][3] |
| SKKN and beauty interests | Meaningful but smaller | Brand value and licensing potential discussed in reporting [3] |
| Cash and investments | Not public | Includes past earnings and deals |
| Real estate and other assets | Not public | Homes, art, and other holdings |
The bottom line: The Skims stake drives most of the move versus Kylie’s net worth in this period [2][4].
Drama draws attention. Attention, when handled with care, turns into demand. The Kardashian Jenner family mastered this cycle for more than a decade. The TV shows, social content, and headlines keep the characters front and center. That media wave then points back to products. It is a flywheel. The show promotes the brands. The brands give the show new plotlines. It all keeps audience interest high.
In short, media oxygen powers the commerce engine. When a family member launches or relaunches a line, the others often support it publicly. That cross promotion makes campaigns bigger at zero or low incremental marketing cost. The effect is strongest for direct to consumer products like Skims, where a single viral drop can move a lot of units in minutes.
Curious how celebrity wealth machines build beyond a single show or brand? See how another star built outside her original label in this breakdown of Paris Hilton’s business moves: Paris Hilton Net Worth Exposed: $300M Empire Beyond Heiress Label.
Beauty sits close to Kim’s brand and offers high margins. Reporting in 2025 continued to track SKKN and related activity. Coverage around the Skims raise also referenced SKKN and possible strategic steps, including discussions about partners that could support distribution and scale. These details signaled that beauty remains a core pillar in the portfolio with room to grow, even as Skims leads the value story [3].
Expect Kim to keep building in categories where her audience sees her as an authority. Skincare and cosmetics fit that map. The playbook is familiar. Launch a focused line. Use celebrity reach to drive attention. Lean on quality and repeat purchase. Then scale with retail partners and international distribution if the signals stay strong.
The family’s Hulu series continues to fuel the brand machine. Each season renews public conversation and keeps social chatter high. That makes marketing more efficient for product launches. The effect compounds as more brands sit under the family umbrella. Viewers watch the story. Then they shop the products connected to that story. This loop lowers promotional costs and raises the odds that a new product finds early traction.
Look at Skims. Its drops often tie to cultural moments, sports tie ins, or new cast storylines. The show creates a calendar of attention. Skims plugs into that calendar. Expect this synergy to continue, because it is a proven driver of sales at scale in DTC and retail.
Skims makes money by selling shapewear, loungewear, basics, and mens pieces online and through select retail partnerships. Profitability details are not public. But the brand’s model has the right signs. DTC margins can be strong. Inventory turns improve when launches are tight and sell through is high. Scale lowers unit costs. That mix gives Skims a credible path to sustained profitability as it grows. The 2025 sales outlook above $1 billion suggests a business with real operating leverage [3][5].
Recent investors include Goldman Sachs Alternatives and BDT and MSD Partners. Wellington Management led a prior growth round. These firms bring capital, network, and consumer brand experience. Their presence supports bigger retail partnerships, global merchandising, and governance that prepares a company for later outcomes like a public listing or strategic deal [3][5].
Management has said the latest funding reflects confidence in the long term vision for Skims. Co founder Jens Grede emphasized that the milestone is about building a durable apparel platform, not just a single product fad [1].
Even great consumer brands face risks. Here are the big ones to keep in mind.
Here is the simple approach we used to avoid hype:
With those steps, the numbers align with the idea that Skims drives most of Kim’s wealth today and explains the gap versus Kylie. It also keeps the discussion honest about how private company stakes work.
Skims built a moat with a simple set of moves.
These elements are hard to copy at once. Many brands can do one or two. Skims does most at a high level, which supports premium pricing and lower marketing spend relative to scale.
Expect a steady drumbeat of new basics, seasonal colors, and mens drops. Expect more owned retail and shop in shop sites in key cities. Funding also supports international growth, where fit adjustments, local payment options, and fast delivery make a big difference. All of this nudges the brand closer to everyday wear, not just special shapewear. That unlocks a much larger revenue base [3][5].
No date is set. But the investor roster, governance focus, and scale of revenue all suggest Skims is building toward optionality. A future IPO or a large strategic transaction is possible if the brand keeps its growth and profits on track. For now, the company is raising private capital at high valuations and executing on growth [3][5].
Public debate has followed the family for years. In most cases, it boosted conversation and search interest that later surfaced Skims to shoppers. The team has learned to manage flashpoints and keep product quality front and center. Smart marketing timing also matters. Launching a drop while the show trends can turn traffic spikes into sellouts.
Media framing can cut both ways though. If a campaign misreads the room, backlash can affect sentiment. That is why approvals and testing are so important in modern celebrity marketing. To see how media choices can shape a story, check this analysis of a 1990s film campaign that sparked debate: Jamie Lee Curtis My Girl Warning: Did 1991 Marketing Mislead?.
The ceiling looks high if product quality and demand stay strong. The two main levers are category expansion and distribution. Apparel basics can touch a huge slice of the wardrobe. Adding more stores and more strategic wholesale partners increases reach. If the company keeps margins in line and inventory tight, valuation growth can continue on top of the 2025 step up [3][5].
Here is a stripped down revenue multiple view that investors often use. It is not a forecast, just a way to visualize the 2025 result.
| Metric | Illustrative Number | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 net sales outlook | Above $1.0B | Company guidance in coverage [3][5] |
| Post money valuation | $5.0B | November 2025 funding [3][5] |
| Implied EV to sales | About 4 to 5 times | Based on outlook band |
These levels are common for premium, fast growing consumer brands that have strong margins and brand strength. The multiple could compress if growth slows, or expand if new categories inflect.
Skims does not disclose full profit details. The model shows healthy signs for profitability at scale. Direct to consumer mix, strong margins, and a sales outlook above $1 billion suggest operating leverage, but exact earnings are private [3][5].
Coverage around the latest funding noted that Skims is on track for more than $1 billion in net sales in 2025. That outlook helped support the $5 billion valuation [3][5].
Goldman Sachs Alternatives led the round. BDT and MSD Partners participated. The raise totaled about $225 million and set the $5 billion valuation [3][5].
Reports have cited about 35 percent. Actual effective value can differ based on investor terms and dilution across rounds. Using conservative assumptions, her stake value is often modeled in the $1.3 billion to $1.4 billion range at the $5 billion valuation [1][3].
Kim’s net worth is estimated at about $1.9 billion in 2025. Skims is the largest driver of that figure [2].
Yes. Kylie Jenner’s net worth is widely cited around $700 million in 2025. The gap mainly reflects the surge in Skims’ value and Kim’s stake [2][4].
There is no public IPO date. The investor roster and scale suggest the company is building toward optionality for a future public listing or a strategic deal if conditions are right [3][5].
Reporting in 2025 continued to track SKKN and related moves, with coverage referencing potential partner activity that could support scale and distribution. Beauty remains a core pillar for growth alongside Skims [3].
Goldman Sachs Alternatives, BDT and MSD Partners, and Wellington Management are among the notable investors mentioned in recent rounds [3][5].
Skims combines a powerful brand, strong DTC economics, and rapid category expansion. It also enjoys large scale promotion from Kim’s platforms and the family’s shows, which lowers marketing costs compared to most peers [3][5].